Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Ballot Dispute in Election of Town of Winslow District 3 Town Councilor

Supreme Court of Maine

January 11, 2018

IN RE BALLOT DISPUTE IN ELECTION OF TOWN OF WINSLOW DISTRICT 3 TOWN COUNCILOR

          Ronald W. Bourget, Esq., Law Offices of Ronald W. Bourget, Augusta, for Jerry A. Quirion.

          Lee A. Trahan did not file a memorandum.

          Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ.

          JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

          LEIGH I. SAUFLEY Chief Justice.

         [¶1] The Town Clerk of Winslow, after conducting a vote recount, tabulated the results and concluded that there was a single disputed ballot in the race for a Town Council seat in District 3 in Winslow in the November 7, 2017, election. Because that single disputed ballot could make a difference in the election, we have original jurisdiction to determine the result of the election. See 21-A M.R.S. § 737-A(10) (2017). Having considered the facts and the applicable law, we find and conclude that the marks on the disputed ballot fail to disclose the voter's intent to vote for either candidate. Accordingly, we enter the following decision in which we confirm that Jerry A. Quirion was elected to the Town Council for District 3.

         I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND

         [¶2] We sit as the trial court in this matter; however, no facts are in dispute except as to the intention of the voter who completed the single disputed ballot. The initial results of the November 7, 2017, election for the office of District 3 Town Councilor in Winslow were reported as 173 votes for Jerry A. Quirion and 170 votes for Lee A. Trahan. Upon the request of Trahan, the clerk or the clerk's designee scheduled a recount, which was held ten days after the election. See 21-A M.R.S. §737-A(3), (4) (2017); 30-AM.R.S. §2531-B (2017); see also 30-AM.R.S. §2501(1) (2017) ("When Title 21-A applies to any municipal election, the municipal clerk shall perform the duties of the Secretary of State prescribed by Title 21-A.").

         [¶3] The Town Clerk supervised the recount, at which both candidates were present with their representatives. See 21-A M.R.S. § 737-A (2017). After applying the Secretary of State's rules for determining voter intent, 8A C.M.R. 29 250 550-1 to -3 (2010); see 21-A M.R.S. § 696(6) (2017), two additional ballots were identified as votes for Trahan because checkmarks were placed next to his name, and one disputed ballot was segregated by the municipal clerk or designee. See 8A C.M.R. 29 250 550-2, §4(1)(A)(2); 21-A M.R.S. § 737-A(7). The final vote count stated in the recount tabulation was 173 votes for Quirion and 172 votes for Trahan, with thirty-eight blank votes and one disputed ballot.

         [¶4] Because "there are enough challenged or disputed ballots to affect the result of an election, " the municipal clerk, upon our order, delivered a copy of the disputed ballot to us for review, and we invited memoranda from the candidates. 21-A M.R.S. § 737-A(10); see also In re Primary Election Ballot Dispute 2008, 2008 ME 117, ¶ 6, 955 A.2d 216. Having received a memorandum from Quirion, and Trahan having waived the opportunity to file a memorandum, we now review the disputed ballot and "determine the result of the election." 21-A M.R.S. § 737-A(10). Our decision "is final and must be certified to the Governor by the Chief Justice." 21-A M.R.S. § 737-A(10).

         II. DISCUSSION

         A. The Disputed Ballot

         [¶5] The ballot that the Town prepared for voters required that a voter, to cast a vote for an individual, "fill in the oval to the left." For the office of District 3 Town Councilor, the ballot directed, "Vote for ONE" of the two listed candidates. On the disputed ballot, a copy of which is appended to this decision, the voter placed multiple marks in black boxes that appear in the margins of the ballot, but the voter did not mark any ovals on the entire ballot. With respect to the race for District 3 Town Council, there is a mark in the left margin beside the outlined box containing Quirion's name and another mark beside the box containing Trahan's name. Unlike some of the voter's other marks in the margins, neither of these marks is in the shape of an oval or circle. The mark in the margin beside Trahan's name is nearer to the oval, but it appears less like an oval and more like a scribble than the mark beside Quirion's name.

         B. Application of the Law

         [¶6] "If a voter marks more names for an office than there are vacancies to be filled or more choices for a question than are permitted, the voter's vote for that office or question may not be counted." 21-A M.R.S. § 696(2)(A) (2017); see 8A C.M.R. 29 250 550-2 ยง 3(2). A vote will also not be counted "[i]f a voter marks the voter's ballot in such a manner that it is impossible to determine ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.