ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
George Z. Singal U.S. District Judge
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on February 4, 2015, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff filed her Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 15) on January 5, 2015. Defendant filed her Reply to Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 16) on January 20, 2015.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is hereby ORDERED that this case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings under the following conditions:
That the issue on remand is limited to assessing the significance of Plaintiff’s IQ testing scores to Plaintiff’s RFC and whether jobs exist in significant numbers in the national economy that Plaintiff could perform in light of her borderline IQ;
That the ALJ obtain further evidence, including testimony, from a vocational expert;
That the ALJ obtain further medical evidence, including testimony, on the issue of Plaintiff’s IQ and its impact on Plaintiff’s functional capacity; and
That the proceedings before the ALJ, including the issuance of the decision, conclude within 60 days of remand; if the decision of the ALJ is a denial of benefits and if Plaintiff appeals from that decision, that ...