Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Young

United States District Court, District of Maine

October 20, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
LAMAR YOUNG Defendant

Defendant LAMAR YOUNG represented by EDWARD S. MACCOLL

Plaintiff USA represented by CRAIG M. WOLFF, DONALD E. CLARK

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

George Z. Singal U.S. District Judge

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on September 1, 2014, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 224) as well as a Memorandum Decision and Order on Motions to Sever and for Bill of Particulars (ECF No. 225) on September 1, 2014. Defendant filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision on the Motions to Dismiss (ECF No. 233) on September 18, 2014. Defendant filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision on the Motion to Suppress (ECF No. 234) on September 18, 2014. Defendant filed his Objection to the Memorandum Decision and Order on Defendant’s Motion to Sever (ECF No. 235) on September 18, 2014. Defendant filed his Objection to the Memorandum Decision and Order on Motion for Bill of Particulars (ECF No. 236) on September 18, 2014. The Government filed its Response to Defendant’s Objections to the Recommended Decision and Memorandum Decision (ECF No. 240) on October 6, 2014.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision and Memorandum Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision and Memorandum Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and Memorandum Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision and Memorandum Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.

2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (ECF No. 112) is GRANTED in part with respect to all statements made by the Defendant on March 11, 2014, other than his initial statement, and otherwise is DENIED.

3. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 109 and 110) are hereby DENIED.

4. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Sever (ECF No. 111) is MOOT without prejudice to the extent that Defendant seeks severance of his trial from those of his co-defendants and otherwise are DENIED.

5. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Bill of Particulars (ECF No. 108) is hereby DENIED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.