Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Belskis v. Somerset County Jail

United States District Court, District of Maine

August 11, 2014

JOSEPH EDWARD BOVIN BELSKIS, Plaintiff,
v.
SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff JOSEPH EDWARD BOVIN represented by JOSEPH EDWARD BOVIN, BELSKISBELSKIS

Defendant SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL represented by CASSANDRA S. SHAFFER, PETER T. MARCHESI.

Defendant MEDPRO ASSOCIATES

Defendant MAJOR DAVID ALLEN represented by CASSANDRA S. SHAFFER, PETER T. MARCHESI

Defendant MAJOR COREY SWOPE represented by CASSANDRA S. SHAFFER, PETER T. MARCHESI

Defendant TRANSPORT OFFICER WAYNE represented by CASSANDRA S. SHAFFER KLINE, PETER T. MARCHESI

Defendant TRANSPORT OFFICER TRAVIS represented by CASSANDRA S. SHAFFER ANDREWS, PETER T. MARCHESI

Defendant OFFICER JOHN MARONEY represented by CASSANDRA S. SHAFFER, PETER T. MARCHESI

Defendant SARGENT ALIJAH MUNN represented by CASSANDRA S. SHAFFER, PETER T. MARCHESI

Defendant CAPTAIN STEVE GIGGY represented by CASSANDRA S. SHAFFER, PETER T. MARCHESI

Defendant PA ROBERT ELLIS

Defendant SUPERVISOR LISA CATES

Defendant RN SARAH LAPLANTE

Defendant RN TRINA LITTLEFIELD

Defendant RN MARIE PATTERSON

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on June 30, 2014 his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 27). The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on July 14, 2014 (ECF No. 28). I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.

2. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate Dismissed Complaint (ECF No. 23) be and hereby is DENIED.

3. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 24) is declared MOOT.

4. It is further ordered that as the Recommended Decision indicates, the Court granted the Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss his complaint without prejudice, which means that the Plaintiff is free to file a new action. However, for the reasons stated in the Recommended Decision, he may not resurrect his voluntarily dismissed action.

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.